La clinique n'accepte pas de nouvelles demandes
Temps de réponse moyen — 5 minutes
Magdalena Sobacinska
Jan 14, 2025
I'd like to remain objective, so I'll start by saying that ECZ undertook my father's treatment. The hospital is beautifully located and the atmosphere is pleasant (except for one doctor, who was permanently in a bad mood). My father underwent three lines of treatment for metastatic kidney cancer, and due to progression, just three months into immunotherapy (the last line of treatment), during a telemedicine consultation, the attending physician said goodbye to my father, ordered him to settle his spiritual and financial issues, and gave him a referral to hospice. This was in May 2024. I won't comment on the sudden end of immunotherapy, as I have no medical training. However, I can draw on the opinions of other oncologists. Even the imaging tests were performed incorrectly; for example, the radiologist attempted to describe a CT scan without contrast and described what was considered a cyst as metastasis. According to ECZ, my father had 20 metastasis-type lesions on his liver—I don't know whether to laugh or cry. He's currently undergoing his fourth line of treatment (RDTL). He's doing well. He's had a pacemaker implanted, and on January 22, 2025, we'll begin radiation therapy for the tumor on his ribs, which could have been irradiated eight months ago! And that's something I can't understand. How can you say goodbye to a patient over the phone without offering anything when they're in good physical condition? My intention isn't to criticize, but to offer an objective assessment and encouragement (a warning) to seek the opinions of at least two oncologists from different institutions. I wish everyone good health!
